8 ’80s Classics You Can Buy for $5000 or Less

Cadillac Cimarron D'Oro Cadillac

It is getting quite difficult to find a car from the “Rad Era” for an entry-level price these days. The generations that enjoyed these cars when new—as well as a younger audience who might have experienced them on the used market—are recognizing their true worth as relevant historical tributes to a decade known for decadence.

It’s not just Lamborghinis and pre-merger AMGs that are getting the attention, either. Demographic changes and an increasingly globalized 1980s automotive marketplace spoiled “young urban professionals” for choice: cars ranging from a 1982 Ford EXP two-seater to an E32 BMW 7 Series luxury sedan each had their own enthusiast audience then, and they do once again today.

As a result, the list of ’80s cars that are in good shape and can be had for $5000 or less is a pretty short one. We dug into the Hagerty Price Guide for cars in #3 condition (a very clean, driver-quality example that runs well) that met our pricing and age criteria, and here’s what we found.

1984–2000 Jeep Cherokee 2.5-liter (XJ)

Some may forget that the AMC-derived, 2.5-liter four-cylinder motor in the Jeep Cherokee lasted so long, but you could indeed get this entry-level mill up until the 2000 model year. It even had a cool name by that point: “Power Tech,” though, given its 125 horsepower and 150 lb-ft of torque, the phrase risks overselling. (The next and final year of the Cherokee was exclusively powered by the 4.0-liter inline-six.) And when you opt for the big four in your Cherokee, you get the perk of owning a 2020 Bull Market pick, but with a more approachable transaction price.

That’s not to say all four-cylinder Cherokees sell below our promised ceiling of $5K. For the 1989 model year, a two-door, two-wheel-drive example averages at $4900; a four-door example goes up to $5000. Add the 4×4 option and prices for both four-cylinder Jeeps jump to $6600. In fact, the cheapest 4×4 is the 1984–85 base model with a one-barrel carburetor, and it will set you back an average of $5800. Interested in the rarer, turbodiesel four-pot Cherokee? Those go for a far steeper $8200.

1988 Buick Reatta

Buick

It is a shame that such a compelling and uniquely styled touring coupe made this list, but the Buick Reatta had a difficult time finding its place in the market. That isn’t likely to be the case for much longer, as only the first year of Reatta production (1988) can be purchased for $4800. This is up 4.3 percent, while 1988 Reattas in #1 condition are up 10 percent to a robust $22,700.

1980–83 Continental Mark VI

Unlike the 1980–89 Lincoln Town Car, which is experiencing a resurgence, the sistership Continental Mark VI can still be purchased for under five grand. The iconic Mark Series was downsized, contemporized, and computerized in the tail end of the Malaise Era, and being early in on that technology hasn’t earned valuations worthy of later Lincolns or earlier Continentals.

The more desirable Mark VI coupe can be had for $4500 in #3 condition, while the more staid sedan rings up for an even more modest $3500. It’s ironic that Continental Mark VIs originally sold for more than their Lincoln Town Car siblings, but the broader appeal and higher production volume of the Townie ensured a comfortable advantage in the classic car market.

1982–88 Cadillac Cimarron

Cadillac

While it takes some serious mental gymnastics to think GM’s J-body would make a car worthy of the Wreath and Crest, the last few years of Cadillac Cimarron production actually made for a decent car. By 1985, GM’s 2.8-liter V-6 had 130 horsepower. A five-speed manual transmission was available, and the front end looked far more like that of a baby ‘Lac and not a tarted-up Cavalier.

Too bad about that, because it wasn’t enough to save the Cimarron. And a mere $2500 in 2024 dollars is needed to buy a #3 condition example, with any powertrain configuration. A shame, because modern motoring could be fun in a 1988 Cimarron with a five-speed and those rad digital gauges, far less so in a 1982 model with its 88 carbureted horses and its less distinctive styling touches.

1982–85 Pontiac Firebird

Firebird S/E (front) and Firebird (rear) Pontiac

How can a third-generation F-body go for this cheap? That’s a fair question, as only the older examples without the Trans Am trim level can be had for less than five grand.

You will need exactly $5000 to buy a 1985 Firebird with a 165-horse 5.0-liter V-8 with a four-barrel carburetor, but a 1985 Trans Am is nearly triple the price ($13,800) with the same engine. Considering the long-term appeal of Firebirds in general, the 1985 Firebird V-8 might be one of the best bargains currently on the market.

1984–88 Pontiac Fiero 2M4

Pontiac

The addition of “2M4” to the title is crucial here, as it stands for “two-seat, mid-engine, four-cylinder.” We aren’t talking about the 2.8-liter, six-pot Pontiacs, just the Iron Duke examples that are currently at $4100 in #3 condition. The smaller engines clearly lacked the performance of those in later models, hotter commodities that include the 1988 Fiero V-6 Formula ($7700), and the 1988 Fiero GT ($12,300).

Consider the Iron Duke Fieros as easily approachable fun from the Rad Era, with style that’s hard to beat at any price. And whenever the lack of power becomes impossible to ignore, give V8 Archie a ring to make those pricey V-6 Fieros nothing but a speck in your rearview mirror.

1985–88 Cadillac Sedan DeVille

Much like the aforementioned Cimarron, values for the baby DeVilles do not reflect their regular updates and powertrain improvements. Numerous internal upgrades were done to the worrisome HT4100 V-8 engine in 1986, and the increase in displacement (from 4.1 to 4.5 liters) made the 1988 DeVille a rather fantastic luxury vehicle with wonderfully tidy proportions. But none of this seems to matter, as all 1985–88 Cadillac DeVilles go for an average of $3500 (up nine percent last quarter), no matter the quality of the engine.

And what of the Coupe DeVille from the same time frame? Those two-door Caddies are above our threshold, running a $5400 asking price (up 10.2 percent) in today’s market.

1985–91 Subaru XT

Alna

Perhaps we saved the best for last, as the Subaru that tried to be normal is such an eye-catching example of 1980s excess. How exactly has the most aerodynamic car not achieved the return on investment seen by cars like the Mazda RX-7 (FC) and Nissan 300ZX (Z31)?

We may never know, but it likely has something to do with Subaru’s more workaday front-wheel-drive architecture (though AWD was optional) and more limited reach thanks to lower production (around 98,000 units globally, less than 30 percent of FC RX-7 production), and a relatively small dealer network in this era. The end result is that a Subaru XT in the high-spec “GL 10 Turbo” trim level only fetches $4700 in modern times. And that’s a bit of a shame, as the looks alone should push it above the $5000 mark.

 

***

 

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.

Read next Up next: GM’s Hands-Free Super Cruise Now Available on 750,000 Miles of Road

Comments

    I bought a 85 Fiero (new). It was a 2M4 with the five speed and the milage was excellent. 50 MPG highway. I traded in a 1984 Bronco 2 with a 4 speed manual, carburated 2.8 V6. Both were underpowered but actually fun to drive. I wish I could find the Bronco and buy it back.

    Forget the Cadillac and the 4.0 go with an Olds or Buick from same period with the Buick V6. Same car and engine is bulletproof

    GM’s front drive X-bodies aren’t well accepted for various reasons, but are quite rare today. I own an ’82 Pontiac Phoenix SJ coupe (original owner) and have enjoyed it. No other like it – only 994 built. Mine is one of only 298 with 4spd. Pontiac did little to promote the SJ as it’s performance was competitive with the TA, and they didn’t want to compromise TA sales.

    Articles like this make me want to unsubscribe from all Hagerty’s emails.

    “The generations that enjoyed these cars when new—as well as a younger audience who might have experienced them on the used market—are recognizing their true worth as relevant historical tributes to a decade known for decadence.”

    Really? Historical tribute to some of the worst cars of the era would be a better opinion than this. No car enthusiast or collector I know in my generation wanted them when they were new or used. I would not want my sons or any budding enthusiast/collector to buy any of these. It’s the fastest way to get to quit this hobby.

    I agree, but I also graduated high school in 96, and the most affordable and economical cars were from the 80’s. Didn’t mean they were the most reliable. 82 Toyota Tercell and both 87
    Plymouth Reliant K cars were okay. Really loved my 85 Ford Thunderbird Turbo coup until it caught fire from a fuel leak. My 88 Jeep Cherokee was a lemon, my 82 Nissan/Datsun 280Z was cool and fast. But most of those 80’s cars suffered from early adoption of smog controls, technology with electronics was poor and problematic when electrical systems went haywire.

    I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call it a “Classic”, but I had an ’84 Chrysler Laser XE turbo 5 speed. Quick little car for the day and looked good too. If I had the room I’d have another.

    What happened to the mid 80’s Dodge Daytona? Never see one. My Turbo 2.2 was a blast and fast. Could get rubber in first and second gear.

    Curious that the latest Number 2 Condition 1985 Mustang GT H.O. valuation comes in the mid to high 20K range? Curious as to why the “F” bodies didn’t keep pace?

    I went through a a fair amount of new Buicks during the 1980s. Experienced broken wires, had to replace cylinder heads, panel rust, disappearing bumper chrome and on and on. Finally realized that I was the living definition of insanity. Kept buying GM cars and expecting something called quality. In the 1990s I went to Ford. Two weeks old and it went back to the dealer for a new transmission. Ran over the fan belt a couple of times, I won’t mention the Firestone issue. In the 2000s I went German. Much better cars, however, the much better reliability, performance and increased fun was more than cancelled out by absolutely absurd cost of repair and maintenance. It looks like cars are just a losing proposition.

    I’ve seen very decent first gen Toyota MR2s for $5k. Also ’80’s Chrysler Turbo cars- Daytona, Charger etc occasionally show up. First and second gen Toyota Supra, Honda CRX am sure I can come up with others

    I had a used 1988 Jeep Cherokee and it was the biggest lemon of a car. Had so many issues with the electronics, and the transmission it was in the shop more than on the road. And when I took it on rough mountain roads the vehicle felt like it was going to break apart due to the stiff suspension. However, it was cool looking and cheap enough. Finally upgraded to a slightly used 2000 Ford Explorer which was a smoother ride, but not as stable as the wide boxie Cherokee.

    I owned a 1988 Honda Prelude si 4 wheel steer back in the day and still feel it was of the most fun rides I ever owned. Good power, terrific handling, reasonable economy and great Honda reliabity and a good looking car in fire engine red. This is the type car that should make your list
    , not junkers like the Cimmaron.

    Lots of car snobery here. I really enjoy seeing a well preserved “also-ran.” If someone really enjoys their 1984 Plymouth Horizon, good for them! It keeps the hobby going. I won’t tell you what my current “classic” is — with this audience, it won’t go well.

    Hagerty: Keep it up! And more Radwood shows, please!

    To us “old timers” there are no “Classic” cars from the 1980’s. Interesting…..Amusing……Not Hideous……but never “Classic”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *