Vision Thing: The best-designed vehicles on the market today

Cameron Neveu

I’ve had the privilege of writing Vision Thing for you for a little while now, and although we’ve covered a lot of ground in car design, there’s much still uncovered. It occurred to me the other day when I was showering: I haven’t really given you an insight into which cars I think have a really standout design—and why.

(You never know when these thoughts are going to hit you; this why you should always carry a notebook. Probably not into the shower, though.)

This time of the year, there are a lot of list articles about, and I’m not one to leave a bandwagon un-jumped on for my readers’ sakes. I know I’ve mentioned a few tangentially both above and below the line, but I will now wheel my own opinions out into the harsh glare of the studio strip lights for a design critique session.

What follows then, is a brief list of standouts currently (or soon to be) available to buy, each of which should make a sizable dent in your kid’s college fund. If you’re thinking about any of these and need an excuse to take to the finance committee, tell them a professional said each is a future design classic.

Lexus LC 500

2021 Lexus LC 500 Convertible side profile shadow light at yacht club
Jordan Lewis

Sometimes a manufacturer struggles with a design language for years, trying to make it work over several different models, before finally the right canvas comes along and it all suddenly makes sense.

Cadillac tried for years with its Art & Science philosophy before finally nailing it on the 2013 ATS. The concept version of the Lexus LC, the LF-LC, showed us in 2012 what its L-finesse language was going to look like—swooping surfaces that twisted in all directions, a massive spindle grille.

It was fabulous.

Unfortunately, the first production Lexus sporting L-finesse clothes was not a big grand tourer but an urban crossover, the NX, which looked like it had been rolled down the stairs. The same story repeated itself with subsequent product releases, but when we got the LC 500 in 2017, it all came together (again) magnificently.

The height of the cowl above the bottom of the side daylight opening (DLO) is much higher than normal, but this allows the metal in front of the door mirror to roll smoothly to the horizontal to meet the hood. It lends the whole car an F1-style forward rake. The dimensions temper the aggressiveness.

Even the trademark spindle grille works in this application. Searingly modern and unmistakably Japanese, it looks like nothing else on the road.

The LC 500 feels like the kind of car Jaguar should be making if it had the daring. But to call the LC a Japanese Jaguar is to sell it short: Gaydon would never be this bold.

The LC 500 is probably my favorite new car on sale, if you’re stuck for something to get your favorite auto-design writer for Christmas.

Ford Maverick

2022 Ford Maverick front three-quarter action
Cameron Neveu

At first, I didn’t totally get the Maverick, a small truck that wasn’t really all that rugged. There were plenty of options for pickup buyers already, although not at this price point.

Then it dawned on me. The Maverick is a direct replacement for the Focus. It’s even built off the same platform. A pickup for the non-traditional pickup buyer.

Suddenly, it all made perfect sense. Eschewing the overt brashness that characterizes basically every other open-backed vehicle on the market, the Maverick is a handsome vehicle with crisp detailing and surfacing that will take you to work without turning your spine to cookie crumbs, and be ready to get mucky on the weekend.

Arguably the Maverick’s best feature is that eye-catching MSRP: $23,690, as of this writing, for a 2023 model. You need a component catalog the size of Ford’s coupled with its economies of scale to get down that low. The strategy is clever as opposed to ruthless and cost-cut. There’s nothing you don’t really need—the base model even comes with old-fashioned steelies. When these become more widely available the aftermarket is going to wild with them, 3-D printers a-whirring.

A sensible, economical, good-looking, and practical commuter vehicle that happens to be a pickup? America, your 1980 Fiat Panda has arrived.

Toyota Prius

New Prius Prototype white
Toyota

Okay. Hands up on who saw this coming? I certainly didn’t.

Toyota stunned everyone when it showed us the 2024 Prius in November. For four generations the Prius has been a worthy but polarizing car, bought by people who took conservation very seriously and wanted everyone to know it. A slightly unnecessary, aerodynamic hunch leant it the appearance of an oversized computer mouse. It was hardly the last word in style. Until now.

The whole part-electric powertrain deal no longer being a novelty (nearly every car on this list is available as a hybrid in one form or another), Toyota has wisely shed the yurts and yoghurt vibe and given us a Prius that no longer trades on economy but on looks. It’s like seeing the server you smiled at in Whole Foods dressed to kill in a swanky downtown cocktail bar.

Squints hard. Prius, is that you?

It’s a much lower, wedgier car for 2024. The high point of the roof has been pulled right back to the rear passenger compartment, which in this or any segment is unheard of. This allows the cant rail to dive seamlessly into the A-pillar.

Volume has been added into the hood at the center line, and the abrupt cut-off tail of previous versions toned down considerably. This no longer feels like a car that places economy above all other considerations, and in sign of growing design confidence, Toyota have cheekily referenced the Ferrari SF90 front headlight graphic.

Surprised? I dropped my wheatgrass smoothie.

Lincoln Navigator

Lincoln

About a year ago my Range Rover Sport slipped into my life. About a day later, off it went into my heart. I bonded with it in a way I never did with my previous daily, an Audi TT.

“Designers are all style over function,” my ass!

Even though mine is a 2011, the Range Rover still has a regal on-road presence and is full of thoughtful touches (and one or two infuriating ones, such as no rear-passenger compartment lighting!). It simply goes about its business quietly and competently. No, I don’t take it off-road, but have you seen the state of the nation’s tarmac recently? I’ll take that day-to-day isolation, thanks.

Ford has not been averse to lifting Range Rover design cues for its bigger SUVs in the past, but with the Navigator, released in 2018 and refreshed last year, Lincoln has a model that can go head-to-head with Gaydon’s best. Look hard enough, and you can see a little modern Range Rover in the Navigator’s body-side surfacing—that’s a compliment, not a demerit. This is domestic luxury that need apologize to no one.

To get a measure of how good the Navigator is, consider that Jeep had a free field goal with the new Grand Wagoneer—and missed it by miles. The Navigator’s wrap-around glazing DLO looks classy, all of a piece and fittingly expensive. The Wagoneer’s body-colored pillars, the exact opposite.

Decorated with just the right amount of chrome, the Navigator exudes American class and authority without going over the top, something that hasn’t always been true of high-end domestic cars in the past. I actually saw a photo of a Navigator in central London recently (probably a diplomat’s car) and you know what? It didn’t look out of place one bit.

As designers we have to accept that customers like SUVs and these days they are willing to trade the last couple of mpg to drive them. To that end, the Navigator doesn’t have a V-8. These cars will continue to exist, so we must make them as safe and fuel-efficient as possible. That they generate good profit margins and support American jobs is something to be celebrated as well.

Ferrari 296 GTB

Ferrari 296 GTB front three-quarter
Ferrari

So we finally got the V-6 baby Ferrari that’s been rumored for who knows how many years. Except it’s not really a baby at all, slotting somewhere into the middle of Maranello’s ever more-confusing range. No matter. The 296 is simply the best-looking Ferrari in an absolute age. It is gorgeous.

That’s not something that can be said of many recent efforts from chief designer Flavio Manzoni. Although generally good in profile and proportion, his vehicles have been extremely complex in the detailing. Surfaces desecrated with nicks and cuts, awkward lamp graphics, and, in the case of the rather plain Roma, the best car Aston Martin never made. Ferrari’s been twisting the marque in knots to create ever more-special editions and even now an SUV.

This is important. Ferrari’s rivals at McLaren have been hampered by spinning a range of indeterminate models off of the essentially the same kit of parts; the carbon-fiber cell and the 3.8-liter twin turbo V-8. Maranello shouldn’t have this problem, given the range of engines and layouts at its disposal: You should know straight away if you’re looking at the mid-engined, entry-level V-8 one, the front-engined, V-12 GT one, whatever the range topper is, and so on. Recently, that hasn’t been the case for Ferrari. At a car show in the fall, a designer friend and I were standing behind an SF90 wondering if we’d got the model designation right.

The 296GTB is a refreshing return to a classically beautiful aesthetic that belies the technical complexity beneath. The nose has one wide, mesh-filled opening, flanked by two smaller air curtains on each side and a smaller, lower central one. It’s simple without being simplistic, an attitude which is very hard to get right. The hips’ air vents are models of restraint, impressive given what the airflow requirements of this thing must be. Rather than punch more holes in the rear body work or increase the size of the rear lights, the rear fog and reflectors are brilliantly and subtly incorporated into the upward surface of the diffuser.

Minimalist without being minimal, this is one of those cars that can only be ruined by the inevitable go-faster version with tacked-on aero kit. What was I saying about that Lexus?

Honorable mentions: Land Rover Defender

2020 Land Rover Defender Gondwana
Brandan Gillogly

It’s been with us for three years. Was it what we expecting? The evergreen original combined Blake’s Satanic mills with British sheer bloody-mindedness. We were never going to get a newer version of that. The workhorse role it was designed for has long since been taken over by base model pickups and ATVs, so how to keep this most beloved nameplate relevant?

By creating a frighteningly modern-looking, tough, capable SUV that, in lower trims at least (get the steel wheels!), maintains some of the class transcendence that characterized the original. The Defender looks like nothing else on the road and shows up the Ineos Grenadier up for the fool’s errand it is.

Honorable mentions: Alfa Romeo Giulia

2022 Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio front three-quarter track action
Brandan Gillogly

I would have put the Mazda6 here, because it remains for me the blueprint for a mid-market sporting saloon, but that body is now ten years old. (It’s also no longer available domestically.)

When I first saw the Giulia, my reaction was Alfa Romeo should have had the Mazda in Alfa Centro Stile as inspiration instead of whatever they did use. But if ever a car looked better in the flesh than photos, the Giulia is it.

Just refreshed for 2022, it was famously crash-designed and developed by a dedicated tiger team after Sergio ordered a do-over. Little wonder that initial cars had teething problems. But it’s one of those cars that makes pause and smile every time I see one out on the road. Tautly organic, faintly muscular, and delicately detailed, the Giulia makes its German rivals look decidedly ordinary.

Adrian Clarke Dodge Challenger SRT 392 rental
Adrian Clarke

I purposely didn’t mention the Dodge Challenger in this list, because if you’ve kept up with my columns, you’ll know my feelings for that particular slice of Mopar design brilliance. Truth is, there are a lot of decent-looking vehicles available for sale right now. Not everything needs to be a design revolution or market disruptor—sometimes getting the basics right, and being solidly handsome, well-marketed, and ably developed is enough.

Hopefully these will give you some inspiration for the January sales (if such a thing will happen in today’s weird new-car market). If not, next time, I’ll tease you with some of my design choices that you can’t buy.

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it.

Read next Up next: “Rambo” 1970 Corvette Stingray is an autocross show-stopper

Comments

    My daughter who is a recent college graduate is buying a Ford Maverick as soon as it’s built.(she ordered it months ago) She is the definition of non traditional truck owner, but after looking at many available vehicle types she was sold on the versatility , mileage of the Hybrid, and cost of the vehicle. I hope that the other manufactures take notice of the wants and needs of the coming generations of automobile buyers and start giving them reasonable buy-ins to their product lines.

    I’ll agree with you on two: The Ford Maverick and the Toyota Prius. I must admit when the Maverisck was first announced, I was kind of meh, about it. Like most everyone else, I thought the truck world isn’t going to accept this into their ranks. Then after discovering who their true market target was, I said to myself, you smart ass bastards, hit this one out of the park! It isn’t for the “truck” market, it’s for a new developing market. Reminded me of the Mustang concept when Iaccoca sold this idea of a developing market to Henry II. Score another one for the saavy market readers! This one’s going to sell big. It’s the right vehicle, for the right market at the right time. The prius has always been kind of dumpy, disjointed design, but the new design is quite attractive. I was considering purchasing one when they first came out, but the sales person scared me with the battery pack replacement cost, and I opted for a Matrix instead, not knowing how long I’d be keeping the vehicle. I would definately give it another look now, for sure.

    It is not going to sell big, at least not if they aren’t going to produce them any faster. Can’t figure that part out, are they just giving time for other manufacturers to get their products out to compete against them?

    “The Maverick’s best feature is that eye-catching MSRP: $23,690.”
    I dare you to find one at a dealer that will sell at that price.

    Yeah, I know, but that’s hardly Ford’s fault. Something I’m going to talk about in the next column has exactly the same problem.

    Good to see your recognition of the Lexus LC 500 – it’s an often overlooked car that looks beautiful and it performs better than it looks. The Ferrari 296 is also a great looking car. The front of the car looks like any other sports car, but the rear curves makes this car stand out. It’s les s boxier than the Ford GT.

    Hate to be the proverbial “turd in the punchbowl”. But, none of the vehicles mentioned really trip my trigger on looks. Part of that is because I use the “hiccup philosophy” to gauge a car’s look. That is, if you start you eye at the front and move rearward, if your eye “hiccups” then it’s not good design.

    The Ferrari as about as close as I’ll come to a complement as a looker, but if I squint, I also see C8 Corvette, which has a whole lot of hiccups!

    Opinions are like…well you know!

    Thought provoking article though.

    It’s the old ‘beauty in the imperfection’ argument. Even the most beautiful objects should have a part that challenges you and makes you pause. The C8 is an absolute disaster, it’s all challenging parts.

    As a Ford salesman since 1977, I admit I am biased toward the Maverick. I do have trouble with Ford totally underestimating demand as the 2023 model order window closed after being open for less than a week this fall! Say what you may, it is a perfect size for those wanting a vehicle to haul lawn waste, crafts and projects, while fitting in the garage and not using a ton of gas. And yes, we do sell them for MSRP and not over list even though profit margins are slim!

    Well folks, I have been driving a Maverick now for the last 12 months. I must say that from a retired building contractors’ point of view that this was one of the best purchases that I have made. Plenty of pulling power for my needs. Example is that a full skid of sod (50-52 rolls) in my utility trailer proved to be no challenge for the Eco-Boost, AWD. Highly recommend.

    The only cars that are more awkwardly styled than Lexus are Nissans and Infinitis although they may actually be better than Lexus at this point. People buy them but I can’t imagine anyone looking at a LC500 sitting next to a F-type and thinking- “wow what a stunning design”. The massive grill simply looks wrong. Even BMW has jumped on the giant ugly grill boat and ruined the 4 series coupe. The LC500 will age like most Japanese cars- not well. In 10 years it will be no more memorable than an Altima. There are a lot of cars I’d take for 100K before a LC500.

    There’s a ‘72 Challenger that’s daily driven in my town that is Sublime green. It looks remarkably modern given the retro appearance of the new models. The modern styling of rides like the Rivian and the new Mustang SUV look like retro ‘90s anime to me.

    I really wanted a Maverick and was ready to put down the cash but got tired of the Ford salespeople acting like they were doing me a huge favor by allowing me to sit in one, and that was before pointing to the $10,000 premium over MSRP. What really irritates me the most is the Ford philosophy. The Ranger was left to die on the vine in the early 2000s, and Ford claimed that the small truck market dried up since everyone wanted an F150. Total BS. Ford finally listened (????) and came out with a modern small pickup, and the waiting list is a year long. I don’t feel like rewarding Ford right now.

    I mentioned up thread but I really don’t like the C8 at all. It’s extremely fussy and a lot of lines don’t make sense. It almost looks like it’s been trodden on. However it keeps up the Corvette tradition of offering a lot of performance for your money and being extremely dramatic. For a lot of buyers, that’s probably enough.
    I came close to including the Bronco, but I really struggle with the ‘bolted on’ appearance of the wheel arch extensions. I really do think they have done a good job with it overall though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *