The BMW 2002 has always been head of the Klasse


There are the extraordinary sleek sports cars, the ornate sedans and coupes. There are the Austin 7s built under license, the bubble cars, and the two-stroke screamers. And then, there is the most desirable series of sport sedans of the post-World War II era, die Neue Klasse. As longtime automotive journalist Ken Gross once wrote: “BMW has had more marketing lives that the proverbial cat…”

Munich management could never be accused of lacking a clear idea of its aims, even if war, management U-turns, and takeover attempts got in the way. Despite heavy losses in those early postwar years—as well as American Motors, the Rootes Group, and even Daimler-Benz making overtures to take over the Munich engine works—the firm survived. But it was 1957 before Heinrich Richter-Brohm was finally able to describe the 1.6-liter four-door that could be stretched into a variety of different-sized models, with a variety of engines—and future-proofed as well. Fortunately, the Quandt brothers, Herbert and Harald, kept faith and gave what was known as “the family-car project” their backing.

BMW 1500 at 1961 Frankfurt motor show
BMW 1500 at 1961 Frankfurt motor show. BMW

It took a while, though. While the first model of the Neue Klasse was exhibited to the public at the 1961 Frankfurt Motor Show as the 1500, it was another year before the car was in serious production.

It carried lots of promise, however, with the talents of Fritz Fiedler overseeing the project, Eberhard Wolff looking after the chassis, Wilhelm Hofmeister in charge of design and body engineering, and Alex von Falkenhausen looking after the engine and drivetrain. Von Falkenhausen based the new M10 engine on one of his earlier designs for a 1.0-liter unit, with a cast-iron block, an aluminum alloy cross-flow SOHC cylinder head, a 30-degree cant, and hemispherical combustion chambers using aluminum alloy rockers to operate the inclined valves. From the off, this engine was designed for more, being strong, with good geometry, bore spacing, and big water jackets. And more it gave, eventually, as it was bored out to 2.0 liters and made an honorable go of it in both Formula 2 and in Formula 1 during the turbo era.

BMW 2002 engine on black
Tim Andrew

It was Hofmeister’s Neue Klasse style that caught the eye, however, because it moved BMW from previous baroque lines of cars such as the 502 to a sort of automotive Bauhaus style in which less is more. With its big greenhouse of a cabin using thin, elegant pillars, the 1500 had distinction as well as outstanding outward visibility for the driver. Those discreet but noticeable kidney grilles also helped establish the heritage tone, and the 1500 perfectly captured the mood of postwar modern optimism. The Neue Klasse was different from not just previous BMWs, but from anything else being sold by competitors.

BMW was determined to market this car in America, where it would have no direct competition, and U.S. importer Max Hoffman could see that a little pocket rocket version was something he could shift in numbers to the young blades of the East and West Coasts. BMW’s production gurus had designed the Neue Klasse to be relatively simple and cheap to manufacture, despite its fine build quality and strong engineering. If the market wanted more, they could supply more. And by late 1963, BMW had launched the 90-hp 1800, with the short-stroke 83-hp 1600 soon following suit.

BMW 1602 rear three quarter vertical black white
BMW 1602 BMW

The 1600-2 arrived in 1966, with a 96-hp version of the M10 engine. Both Falkenhausen and Helmut Werner Bönsch, BMW’s director of product planning, had owned the 1602 model and had fitted the 2.0-liter version of the M10 into their cars. Hoffman, too, was making all the right noises about a still more powerful version of the Neue Klasse. Ken Gross reckons that Hoffman even threatened to commission a series of 2.0-liter cars from Schorsch Meier, BMW’s Munich distributor.

The stars, it would seem, were aligned.

For the BMW 2002, then, the 1991-cc M10 unit from the 2000CS proved the perfect fit. It was initially offered in carbureted form, which Car and Driver editor David E. Davis Jr. described thusly in one of the most famous pieces of automotive journalism: “This little two-door sedan has all the cojones and brio and elan of cars twice its size and four times its price.” Meanwhile, Auto Bild, the influential German magazine, called the 2002 the Fluster Bombe (whispering bomb). Almost overnight, the car established BMW’s reputation in the U.S., not as a maker of fussy and expensive sedans and coupes, but as the purveyor of thrills to a young generation anxious to cut the ties with their parents’ ideas and taste.

Motor magazine’s redoubtable test department in the U.K. got its hands on the mechanically-injected (aka Kugelfischer) 2002tii in 1972. The test began with the observation that in recent years, “modern suspension and engine developments have blurred the distinction between sports cars and saloons, many four-seat closed cars now being quicker round corners as well as on the straight.” You can see where they were going here.

And so it proved on the test track, with the 130-hp/131 lb-ft fuel-injected model shaving a second off the carbureted 2002’s 0–60-mph time, from 9.2 sec to 8.2 sec. Top speed (largely a function of aerodynamics) was the same 113 mph as the carbureted car, though the injected test model was suffering some maladies.

As with most Neue Klasse tests, auto journalists loved the handling, the updated brakes, and the optional five-speed transmission. They weren’t alone in observing, however, that the high price didn’t buy much in the way of creature comforts and extra equipment.


I have a history with the 2002. Go back 44 years and imagine such a car heading east on the open sweeping bends of A3052 and A35 as they hug the south coast of England. It’s 2 a.m. on a frosty December night and behind the curved windscreen two young subalterns’ faces glow with the luminescence of reflected headlamps and the instruments. Their little 4.23-metre saloon is gathering serious pace through the moonless night. Sidmouth, Seaton, Bridport, Dorchester, and Poole, outside the side windows, these ancient towns slumber, the rasp of the BMW’s exhaust barely stirs the chilly night as fog creeps into the valleys and flood plains.

Cherchez la femme? Of course it was. These two young infantry officers had crept out of camp and escaped basic training for a precious weekend with their sweethearts. Their transport of delight and desire? A 2002tii. Young hearts run free? They certainly do if you’ve got the keys to this Munich masterpiece in your lovat green trouser pockets. After four and a half hours of fast driving, the buzz as we arrived in Brighton gave us flushed faces and a need for breakfast.

I was one of those young officers, which means I owe that old 2002 a big debt of gratitude. Without it, I would never have met the future Mrs. English, though what she made of me at an art school party in the middle of the early Eighties New Romantic period I can only guess.

Sparing my blushes, I can still recall the Bimmer’s big gear knob shaped like the cork of a huge port bottle, the slightly over-centre clutch feel, the eager revving of the 2.0-liter four and the faithful handling as we swept through roundabouts and tight curves.

Miller and Norburn entered BMW 2002s in several IMSA GT racing events
2002s were always faithful handlers. ISC Archives/Getty Images

In later years, BMW’s shiny-suited marketers would cast a slur upon the 2002’s road holding as the company introduced the first 3 Series, then the Z axle for the E36 generation of the ’90s, but as much-lauded journalist and serious racer Tony Dron once observed of the 2002: “This was a serious car developed by driving enthusiasts for driving enthusiasts.” Nuff said.

These days BMW is trying to recapture the magic with its second-generation Neue Klasse, which it endlessly teases at motor shows. It claims this new battery-electric architecture will go on sale in 2025, and the latest iteration of the design was shown at the Munich Mobility Show last September. It was accompanied by the latest in electronic software and what’s known in the industry as “circular manufacturing,” a system in which materials have second or even third lives.

It isn’t just the raw steel and seat fabrics that are manufactured with recycled material in an endless circular process these days. Wilhelm Hofmeister will have been looking down with a smile on his face at the retro design of the new Neue Klasse, which in places looks less like circularity and more like plagiarism.

If you want an original in America, these old BMWs are tough, easy to keep, good to drive, and practical. The ravages of rust need to be watched out for, but a #3 (Good) condition 2002tii can be yours with change for $40,000 on average, or a carbureted 02 for under $30,000.

I must admit I’m tempted—if only to recapture a lost youth.




Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: According to You: These rides were nothing but bad luck


    I would like to drive a restored one of these. I have heard good things.

    All of the ones I have driven were used up, rusted out money pits.

    They did not endure Ohio winters well here and were gone by the time I was old enough to drive.

    ” recapture the magic with its second-generation Neue Klasse, “. Yea right, not gonna happen. Most likely it will be a bloated, heavy thing, with no character. Sorry to say, but to me, BMW has lost its way.

    I owned a 2002 in the early 70’s, it was fun to drive, surprised many sports car and Detroit Iron drivers as it was still relatively unknown. Unfortunately, it was also most trouble prone car I have owned in my entire life (that’s saying a lot since an MGA and Peugeot 403 preceded the Bimmer). Blown head gasket, gearbox synchro failure, brake booster failure, u joint (s) failed, front shocks leaked, exhaust system literally fell apart, clutch lever broke. All this on a car that had about 65K on the odo when I managed to unload it. (And no, I’m not particularly hard on my cars and do perform maintenance by the book). The shocks and exhaust were not huge deals, allowed me to replace w/Konis and an Abarth system. The window lift gear even wore out, so driver’s window wouldn’t close completely, not unusual, as there was talk in the BMWCCA newsletter on how to fix. Then the rust started, that’s when I ran into a guy with a couple of BMWs and added mine to his stash. I still see restored 2002’s on the street and remember how much fun they were to drive, but then the memories of endless repairs come flooding back. I read Rob Segals (sp?) articles and wonder if he’s a mechanical genius or just plain crazy, he does amaze me. Owning the Bimmer did give me an excuse to acquire an impressive selection of tools, so it wasn’t all bad.

    BMW recapturing the magic is highly unlikely in their increasingly tech larded up and battery powered future. They are kind of dead to me. I would like to drive or be driven in a 2002 just for the experience.

    I was wrenching at a Fiat/Alfa store and a BMW 1600 trade-in was available cheap. Owning that car showed me the difference between a commodity and art. And that a $0.90 Fiat gasket could cost $9.

    My first new car was a ’71 2002. Riviera blue. It was a great car to drive, also a great car to wreck. I hit a utility pole at about 50 mph & very severely damaged the car. I walked away with a sprained wrist. I’ve owned BMWs since then 2 of them 2002s, one with s14 engine, 5 speed, big brakes, etc. They were great cars for their time & still are.

    My posting name kinda explains my feelings for 02s. I still have my first one, bought new at Bavarian Motors in May 1969. Still a daily driver but no salty winters since 1999, that after several years to repair 30 Ohio winters. Drivetrain is still original after 227k miles. My 73 also does non-salt daily driver duties and is still going strong at 275k miles.

    But none of that describes why I have a big grin on my face whenever I get behind the wheel. Way too much fun, even after 54 years.

    This is a great example as to why we need a “like” button. 🙂

    Back in the late ’80s I had a ’75 ’02. It was quite solid, ran well and was a LOT of fun to toss around. I still kick myself for letting it go. Sigh. 🙁

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *