These modern cars share common threads with old classics

Mecum

It all started with an innocent analogy. Hagerty Price Guide editor Greg Ingold was extolling to editor Kyle Smith the virtues of the limited run of LT4-powered Camaros that Street Legal Performance helped build for Chevy in 1997. Knowing that Smith has knowledge of 1960s GM performance, Ingold loosely equated SLP’s effort to the Yenko Camaros from back in the day. The conversation snowballed from there.

The two took to Slack, our internal messaging system, and asked fellow editors what cars we felt were modern equivalents of old classics. This banter-driven search to find common threads between older and newer vehicles yielded some answers you might expect, as well as a few that stretch logic, and the definition of “classic,” just a little. This list is the result of our fun and non-exhaustive quest to find modern equivalents to old classics. Let us know your pairings in the comments.

First-generation Yenko Camaro and 1997 Camaro SS LT4

Believe it or not, these cars are far more similar than meets the eye. Yenko came to fame by doing what GM wouldn’t, installing the powerful L72 code 427 into the first-generation Camaro (1969 would use the COPO program to have the swaps done at GM). So what does this iconic early Camaro have to do with a fourth gen?

Like Yenko in the 1960s, Street Legal Performance (SLP) was closely affiliated with GM, but independently upgrading F-bodies for sale through GM dealer networks. The similarites don’t stop there, though. SLP happened to take delivery of a number of leftover LT4 engines from the Corvette program. What do you do with a bunch of potent small-blocks? Naturally, you’d swap them into something, and that’s just what SLP did. So, 29 Firebirds and 106 30th Anniversary Edition Camaros got the transplant. This would be the most powerful fourth-generation Camaro you could order from your dealer, and that’s before you consider the LT4’s standard 330 horsepower is rumored to be conservative after SLP allegedly fiddled with them. — Greg Ingold, Hagerty Price Guide Editor

Chevelle SS 396 and Honda Civic Type R

Hear me out: Door count aside, they’re both hot-rodded versions of their company’s mid-size platforms. It doesn’t end there, though. The once-ubiquitous Chevelle and still-everywhere Civic can carry four comfortably, they sport clean, handsome designs (I’m considering the current-gen Civic), and the performance versions are incredibly capable relative to their competition. If you look at each in their moment rather than as an American classic vs. a Japanese hot hatch, they’re going after similar targets. There’s no comparison as to which sounds better, though. — Eddy Eckart, Senior Editor

Ford Mustang II and Ford Mustang Mach-E

Many Mustang fans saw the Mustang II’s move to Pinto architecture as a step backward. It turned out it was the right car for the time, selling in huge numbers just when consumers wanted an efficient model with some Mustang style. Likewise, the move to broaden the Mustang brand into an EV crossover was controversial and still has Mustang die-hards in a tizzy. However, the buying public doesn’t seem to mind, as they’re snapping up the sporty four-door and enjoying EV power and efficiency. — Brandan Gillogly, Senior Editor (It remains to be seen whether Ford will make a Mach-E King Cobra—Ed.) 

Volkswagen Rabbit Pickup and Ford Maverick

The Ford Maverick is a new take on the pickup form factor that shrinks the footprint, offers an incredibly efficient front-wheel-drive layout, and is built from a platform better known for the cars it supports. Sound familiar? Volkswagen did the same thing with the Rabbit for the U.S. back in the late ’70s. It was charming, if a little chintzy at times—a few descriptors that may or may not be appropriate for the Maverick as well! — Nathan Petroelje, Editor

Volvo 122 and Hyundai Elantra

We’re all going out on limbs with these comparisons, but I’ll test the breaking point of the outer reaches by saying the Hyundai Elantra is the new Volvo 122. Ignoring the 122’s coupe and wagon variants for a moment, both machines are humble sedans with fantastic design. And if you compare each to models that preceded them (for the Volvo, that’d be the PV444/544; for the Elantra, that’d be any other Elantra) the styling departure is downright revolutionary. — Stefan Lombard, Senior Editor

Duesenberg Model SJ and Koenigsegg CC850

Born from engineers who felt they could do it better than anyone else, Duesenberg and Koenisegg own the cutting edge of their respective eras. Their exclusivity and use of advanced technology means these cars were and likely will forever be out of the reach of the common enthusiast, but their successful niche implementation of tech innovations helps advance the entire industry. Four-wheel hydraulic brakes were at the forefront in 1929 when Fred and Augie Duesenberg put them into production, and a Koenigsegg-style single speed transmission that works for every speed from 1 mph to 250 mph might just be something that becomes standard on passenger cars one day. — Kyle Smith, Editor

Yenko Stinger and Porsche Cayman GT4

The conversation started with a Yenko reference, and because Kyle is a noted Corvair aficionado, it couldn’t help but take a turn to the Yenko Stinger—Ed.

There are of course the obvious similarities: the flat-six mounted behind the seats, purposely stripped interiors, the focus on outright speed and an engaging driving experience. The two also stand in the shadows of their more famous siblings. Yenko might be best known for Camaros and Novas, but he started with SCCA D-Production competition with the second-generation Corvair as the base car. Similarly, ask someone about Porsche, and they’re more likely to mention the 911 than the Cayman, even though there’s an argument to be made for the smaller Porsche. Both of these track rats will abuse you with stiff suspension, quick steering, and road noise. You’ll love every minute if driving experience is what you are after, though. — Kyle Smith

Volkswagen Beetle and Toyota Prius

The Beetle was known for its counterculture appeal, which was grounded in the ideal of efficiency. It also looked different, had a different drivetrain, and seemed ubiquitous in the mid 20th century. The Prius captured all of those things for a new era. — John Wiley, Manager of Valuation Analytics

1970 Dodge Challenger R/T Hemi and 2023 Ram 1500 TRX; 1970 Ford Mustang Boss 429 and 2023 Ford F-150 Raptor R

While on the surface these two pairings may seem a bit odd, these four vehicles all share a no-limits attitude and capture a high point in a changing industry. I also expect most of those trucks will get driven just like those apex muscle cars of 1970, which means a lower survival rate. — John Wiley

 

***

 

Want a better understanding of what’s driving collector car values? Sign up for the Hagerty Insider newsletter.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: The 2024 Tacoma: What you need to know

Comments

    How about the 65 -67 Olds 442 compared to today’s BMW sport sedans. Really comfortable interiors, RWD, State of the art road handling suspension for its era, gobs of muscle for acceleration, ability to maintain very high speeds for long distances on the open road without blowing up, and moderately poor fuel economy on premium fuel. All of which in a package that the owners will defend till the day they die.

    A very easy comparison is the original Mercedes 300SL Gullwing and Roadster and their modern siblings, the Mercedes SLS Gullwing and Roadster. All, by the way, fabulous cars !!

    I don’t take drugs, but if I did, I would like to know the type that y’all were taking when you wrote this?
    Mustang II and Mach E….. Really ? I think in the last few days I have made two bowel movements that remind me of both of those vehicles.

    WOW! As a 75 year old motor head, who does, by the way, appreciate the performance of the new cars, this whole idea is somewhat ludicrous to me. Apples to oranges as far as I’m concerned. Mona Lisa to Campbells soup art. Sadly, for me, the vintage/classic/muscle cars will never again be matched. maybe in sheer performance, but not in the way they affect people. just my take.

    To be fair, that “Campbells soup art” has sold for tens of millions of dollars. Clearly people of different ages connect with different eras of art–and cars. If every car on the road was a ’60 muscle car they would also be pretty boring.

    Soup art is not the Mona Lisa no matter who pays how much for it. The only “thread” connecting the two is the usage of the word “art.”

    You apparently missed the tenor while noting the tone of the comments.

    “but not in the way they affect people”

    Perfect summation.

    Most of these are a stretch at best, meant to evoke responce. The Camaro to Camaro being the only one that works more than a whisper.

    “but not in the way they affect people”

    Perfect summation.

    Most of these are a stretch at best, meant to evoke responce. The Camaro to Camaro being the only one that works more than a whisper.

    Since this article has appeared again I will say this list makes very little sense.

    I have one you could add to the list the 1966 Ford Mustang and the 2023 Kia Carnival. Does that make sense? No it doesn’t. Perfect for this list.

    If you reread the intro, the comparisons SHOULD start to make sense, but I think you’re having trouble seeing past the dislike of the newer cars being compared to get the spirit of the article.

    I think you guys need to get off the juice before you decide to make these kinds of “humorous” comparisons. Almost as bad as the meandering worthless article on music.

    Yeah, these people are running out of ideas on the “market trends”, so they coughed up an ill-conceived bunch of pairings with caveats throughout “hear me out..”, “going out on a limb…”, “believe it or not..”
    Sorry, but this article was terrible and I want my 3.4 minutes back

    “that’s before you consider the LT4’s standard 330 horsepower is rumored to be conservative after SLP allegedly fiddled with them” Any proof?

    Nothing beyond a shadow of a doubt that I could uncover, but it isn’t an uncommon rumor and somewhat accepted. Hence the careful choice of words.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *