The Z3 at 30: The Roadster BMW Needed

Julie Gu

When you hear those famous three letters, BMW, what do you think of first? Fast sedans and coupes likely, or maybe luxury chariots for captains of industry. Either way, your first thought probably won’t be the Munich firm’s fine selection of roadsters and sports cars. Throughout its history, however, Bayerische Motoren Werke has made plenty of standout and sexy two-seaters. Open-topped sports cars in particular have been there almost from the start, with the 3/20, and famous 328 of the 1930s, through to the legendary 507 of the 1950s. By the late 1980s, however, BMW hadn’t made a mass-produced open-topped two-seater for 30 years. 

BMW roadsters
Left to right: The Z1, Z3, Z8, and Z4 represent a long tradition of BMW roadsters that dates back to the 1930s.BMW

Marking its maker’s triumphant roadster return was the remarkably innovative Z1 of 1989. Not only did this sporting BMW see its firm plough a long fallow furrow, but it also kicked-off the Z lineup as we know it. 

The Z1 was a bold machine, both in terms of its styling—the work of Harm Lagaay—and its engineering, having leapt from the clever minds of workers at BMW’s Technik GmbH division. Established in 1985, just a few years prior to the Z1’s launch, BMW Technik’s role was mainly focused on R&D and technical innovation. The division came up with the Z1 as a concept to showcase its innovative new construction techniques; series production was never on the to-do list. That goes some way to explaining why the Z1’s doors disappear into its sills, it has easily replaceable plastic bodywork, and an all-new Z-axle independent rear suspension. We don’t envy the poor production engineers tasked with figuring all that out for production, but they managed it, admirably. 

BMW Z1
BMW

“Clever” and “innovative” are often bywords for “expensive,” however, and the 8000 Z1s sold through the end of production in 1991, at an MSRP close to $45,000, somewhat proved that point. This hand-built roadster’s numbers really only represent a drop in the motoring ocean, but it showed there was still an appreciative audience eagerly awaiting more BMW roadsters. 

Fast forward to September 1995, and the world was introduced to the far more conventionally engineered, yet equally striking, Z3. Sharing much of its platform with the three-door BMW 3 Series Compact, the Z3 was a lot easier than the Z1 to mass produce, but in a bold move, that responsibility wouldn’t fall upon German workers. Instead, the Z3 was assembled at BMW’s Spartanburg plant in South Carolina, making it the first model in the firm’s history to be entirely produced outside of Germany. 

BMW Z3 production
BMW

Initially only available with an underwhelming, if revvy, 140-hp 1.9-liter four-cylinder, the Z3 lacked the ultimate pace and agility to really shine. Parts sharing with the 3 Series came back to bite drivers who really liked to press on, as the Z3 was devoid of its predecessor’s clever rear Z-axle. It instead relied on the older semi-trailing arm arrangement. These early criticisms might have been overlooked a generation earlier, but with mid-1990s competition including the Mazda Miata, Mercedes-Benz SLK, and Porsche Boxster, there was nowhere for a sub-par Z3 to hide. 

BMW, to its credit, heard its critics and responded at the end of 1996 by slotting its fabulous 2.8-liter M52B28 inline-six engine under the Z3’s long hood. This gave it a much more favorable 190 horses, which rivaled or exceeded those aforementioned contemporaries. In fact, the power hike from that six elevated Z3s above the majority of the resurgence roadster roster of the second half of the 1990s. 

For 1999, the four-cylinder was replaced by a more sprightly 170-hp 2.3-liter six, and BMW introduced a hatchback to the mix as well, affectionately dubbed “the clownshoe” for its proportions in profile. By 2001, the 2.3 gave way to a 2.5, while the top motor in the Z3 lineup was a 3.0-liter making 225 horsepower.

But what is a BMW performance car without an M variant? The company’s motorsport and tuning wing at Garching had been keen to get its mitts on the Z3 as soon as the model was discussed. Slotting the motor from the contemporary E36 M3 into the little Roadster and the Coupe soon after was a no-brainer, but there was a little more to it than that. To handle the extra grunt from the M3’s S50B32 3.2-liter mill (later upgraded to the E46 M3’s S54) M gave the car a firmer, lowered, and reinforced suspension. A wider track front and rear was paired with wider rubber to help avoid this ultimate Z3 pointing perpendicular to the tarmac. 

Easier said than done with such a short wheelbase and 240 hp (and later 315 hp) sent to the back wheels; the eventual introduction of traction control helped matters, however. The rabid Z3 could get to 60 mph in just over five seconds in either configuration. 

BMW Z3 M side profile
Eric Weiner

Throughout production, there were a few styling revisions to the Z3 that either further enhanced the original work of Joji Nagashima or detracted from it, depending upon your preference. Original four-cylinder cars have a “narrow” body, most noticeable from a direct rear view, while six-cylinder and M versions got stouter “hips.” The whole range was facelifted in 1999, when the Coupe body was also added to the range, adding chrome-ringed headlights and L-shaped tail lights; along with a host of other minor interior and exterior updates. 

You probably don’t need us to tell you that the Z3 sold a whole lot better than the more bespoke Z1; BMW managed to shift more than 297,000 by the end of Z3 production in 2002. There was a time when they were seen on every main street, though today sightings are certainly a rarer occurrence. Indeed, its controversial replacement, the Z4, has enjoyed a far longer production spell.

Most Z3s—aside from those with very low miles or the M models—are still cheap, considering the style and performance on offer, which makes the Z3 an entertaining and affordable way into modern classic motoring. That’s a win-win in our book.

2001 BMW Z3 2.5i rear three quarter action
Sandon Voelker
Read next Up next: 7 Simple Projects to Refresh Your Vintage Ride

Comments

    Thanks for your article, John-Joe. The little low-mile Z3 creampuff that I discovered last year, has really been a fun, reliable little roadster for me. Your article caught my eye, since the lead photo matches what I drive: a beautiful triple-black ’97, with the I-4 and a 5-speed.
    The 1.9 is definitely not a scorcher by any stretch of the imagination, but for me, is more than adequate, with over double the HP of the rusty, but nearly-equally-enjoyable ’72 drop-head coupe K-Ghia that I had during my college years (just a few decades ago!).

    Great cars, all of them. We’ve had a 1997 in the family since 1999. Despite being the “worst” version, our little Bond clone with its 1.9-liter and (*gasp*) autotragic never fails to make me smile.

    Doesn’t mean it’s not getting a stick swap at some point, mind you.

    Just returned from a drive in my 1996 Z3 when I saw this article. It had covered only 18K miles when I acquired it on Hagerty auction last May. Every drive puts a big smile on my face. When I recall how little I paid for it my smile gets even bigger. Anticipating many years of motoring fun ahead.

    One minor edit… The “2.3” model was actually a 2.5L, confusingly misbadged to create more numeral distinction between it and the optional 2.8L of the same year. When the 2.8 went to the 3.0, they adjusted the badging to 2.5. This was the same time as the E46 323i and 328i were offered with the same engines, 2.5L and 2.8L, respectively.

    Yep, for some reason I like the look of that oddball with an M motor under the hood. All are fun cars but I definitely prefer the straight six power.

    “For 1999, the four-cylinder was replaced by a more sprightly 170-hp 2.3-liter six”
    It was a 2.5L (M52TUB25) labelled as 2.3 to ease the pain of the $5K premium for buying the 2.8.
    Also, the early ///M roadsters with the S50 made over 300 HP but were only sold outside the US – the US got the S52 – same as the US version of the E36 M3 – it was the one that only made 240 HP. For 2001, everyone got the S54, the best naturally aspirated 6 BMW ever made.

    I test-drove one in 2001 for a Susan B. Komen Cancer event on Hilton Head Island. Decided I preferred my 1980 320 more. However, 15 years later when I was looking for something fun to drive (I had sold the 320 when I moved to Colorado Springs), I was discouraged by the costs of decent MGBs, TR4s or TR6s. Not wanting to “settle” for something I had to restore, I started looking at Z3s. Took me a year, but I found an ’01 in Palm Springs, CA that checked all my boxes: White (Alpenweiss III), 3 litre manual and under 100k miles (84k actually). Flew out, closed the deal for $7500 USD and drove it home to Colorado Springs. I’ve been in love ever since!

    When I mentioned my interest in looking for a Z3 back in 2007 my son said “no, you need to look at an M roadster”. When I asked what that was he replied “think of a Z3 on steroids. Boy was he right! The 2000 Cosmos black gem was a blast to drive, handled beautifully, and stopped even better. Although I let her go a couple of years ago to get a C7 Stingray, I do miss that little roadster.

    Well we’re certainly fans of the Z3 platform, though most of ours__3 out of 4__are the M variant. In fact it was only last August that we got our first Z3 (non M) a 3.0 Coupe in Sienna Red / Walnut leather with “chromeline” interior trim and automatic xmsn. My wife found it listed on the Schuh Syndikat FB page, where it was touted by Jon Martin (MCoupebuyersguide.com) for being a One of One specification.

    Our “other Zs” consist of a ’99 M Rdstr (purchased 11/00 as a CPO), a 2001 M Rdstr that we collected at the factory in Spartanburg (08/01, the day before the BMW sponsored Roadster Homecoming) and a ’99 M Coupe with a rare Eurosport Twinscrew Supercharger (bought from a customer 02/14).

    We like them. A lot!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Please enter a valid email address

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.