Cadillac’s XLR: A Good Car with a Flawed Business Model

Cadillac

Aside from the standalone Escalade, for the last few decades, Cadillac might best be characterized by its pivot to targeting German luxury. Those efforts ultimately bore fruit in several generations of very capable sedans, but its halo effort with the hardtop convertible XLR suffered a much more abbreviated history.

When it comes to contextualizing Cadillac’s 2004-09 XLR roadster, comparing it with its Allanté predecessor is almost mandatory. But let’s cast new light on that discussion: All mass-produced cars need to generate a return on investment, no matter how limited said vehicle’s production is to its parent company. (At least that used to be true.) And, because an aspirational look and feel in a luxury product is crucial, creating a luxury vehicle is anything but cheap. Cost is where things got sideways with the Allanté, but, at least in part, it was Cadillac’s pivot in the other direction that did in the XLR.

Old and New, so happy together.Mercedes-Benz

The XLR had its path to success laid out, at least in theory: Mercedes-Benz’s SL roadster has walked this financial tightrope quite well for decades. The flagship Merc shares parts with cars of cheaper origins, but then again many Americans still consider Mercedes C-class-sourced switchgear more prestigious than the bits lifted from something like a Buick Ranier. The Allanté’s radical departure from traditional GM products proved financially unviable, so with that and the SL’s success in mind, GM elected to build the XLR at its Bowling Green Assembly Plant alongside the Chevrolet Corvette.

Perhaps “alongside” the Vette is a misleading term, as the XLR wasn’t made on an assembly line. GM instead created the requisite floor space at Bowling Green to park a “kit car” in a dedicated work station, then engineered a way to route all componentry to that area. This treatment is generally reserved for the likes of Bugatti, which theoretically makes the XLR’s origin story more bespoke than the Italian Allanté.

Pininfarina

Recall that Italian coachbuilder Pininfarina utilized a traditional assembly line to partially assemble the Allanté before its final assembly in Hamtramck, MI. Instead of creating all this profit-sucking overhead for a low volume vehicle, the XLR did a great job intelligently leveraging GM resources. Perhaps the General learned from its mistakes, and the XLR will fare better than the star-crossed Allanté?

The XLR coulda been a contender, stretching Cadillac’s Art and Science garb across the C6 Corvette’s long wheelbase and wide doors. It was hot on the heels of the segment-busting success of the original Escalade, a fresh and appealing vehicle that brought some fresh energy to the brand. Lightning could strike twice for Cadillac, and this time it’ll come from Caddies assembled alongside Chevrolet vehicles.

The XLR had the performance pedigree of the Corvette’s well regarded Y-platform, but with a unique persona and rowdy sound thanks to its 32-valve Northstar V-8 with 320 horsepower routed to a 5-speed automatic transaxle at the rear. It cherry picked the best of the best from General Motors, wrapping it in unique coachwork first teased by the Cadillac Evoq concept.

The only telltale sign of Corvette DNA was the XLR’s central exit exhaust. Avoid fixating on those pipes and its power retractable hardtop comes into focus. The 2001 Mercedes SL (R230) set the precedent, making this a mandatory feature for luxury convertibles seeking to dethrone the king. Cadillac was ready, or so they thought.

Unfortunately the public was not terribly impressed with what hit the showrooms. Sales for the first two years of XLR production were 3,665 and 3,730 units, respectively. That number roughly halved in 2006, and dwindled to a mere 787 units in 2009, the XLR’s final year in production. The story should end there, but it doesn’t: Cadillac dealers sold the last 13 units of aged-out XLR inventory in 2011.

The figures look worse when considering the Mercedes SL-class never went below 4,000 units annually in the United States during the same production run. (Global SL sales hovered near 10,000 units annually.) People tend to vote with their wallets, and Mercedes-Benz won this endurance race.

Perhaps noted Italian fashion house Bulgari should have fashioned more than just the speedometer bezel? But GM already tried this with that other Italian design firm for its other roadster roughly two decades prior.

When Motorweek got their hands on the Cadillac XLR, they noted the size and weight advantages of its Corvette-inspired chassis over its competition. The folding top mechanism was sourced from the same vendor that made the Mercedes SL transform from coupe to convertible so effortlessly, and the car was priced $10,000 less. Performance times were class competitive, but Motorweek suggested the Northstar’s “sounds and sensations” lacked the polish of its competition.

Handling was stunning, with a ride superior to any Corvette, but Motorweek didn’t compare the XLR to the Mercedes in this metric. That’s unfortunate, as Cadillac wasn’t necessarily looking to steal buyers from the Bow Tie brand’s sports car. Motorweek also made a troubling assertion at the end, saying this “rookie roadster may not yet be the class leader, but right out of the gate it proved to us that it could easily trot with the front runners.”

Wordsmithing is fun, and we automotive journalists are darn good at casting doubt on a vehicle’s prospects without actually saying so.

Cadillac

We haven’t yet mentioned the V-series XLR, which sported a 443 horsepower supercharged Northstar, an extra forward gear, and bigger wheels/tires/brakes. Performance was similar (possibly superior in some metrics) to that of an AMG-fettled SL55, but overall XLR sales volume ensured this upgrade couldn’t alter the trajectory of this tragic hero.

The XLR had Germanic intentions on a Bowling Green budget, but a “rookie roadster” wasn’t going to have much time to prove itself. Its failure isn’t from a single cause, but value-based pricing in a market that covets snob-appeal is a major concern, and despite its efforts to learn from the Allanté, Cadillac didn’t quite find the right recipe for halo car success.

Perhaps the new Cadillac Celestiq being aimed at the ultra-wealthy is the right move, because the legacy of the XLR and Allanté suggest a business model that counts on competitive cost and ambitious sales numbers is invalid. Put another way, “Fool me twice, shame on me.”

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: Never Stop Driving #122: Honoring Those Who Served
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    I remember these well and knew a few owners. It was a good car but the Corvette handled better was faster and cheaper.

    The V series was a better starting spot. It was a step above the Vette and was worth more money. But they would never price it a bit lower.

    GM never understood the Allant’e as FWD was never going to work. The XLR was too much Corvette for the price.

    It has made them great deals on the used car market.

    I would love to see a nice roadster on the Alpha platform today with the CT5v drivetrain.

    I was a CTS-V owner during this era. The only XLR at our dealer sat for two years. That being said my V sat for the better part of a year–so I could make a good deal. Do all Caddys have electrical problems like mine?

    XLR was a cool car though. I gather they have extremely expensive taillights if you can find a replacement. A guy fixes them for $1500 a light..

    Right front headlamp assembly damaged in parking lot bump and run. Okay, no big deal just get another one. Wrong. GM doesn’t support them any more and replacements are apparently very hard to find. Craig’s List had one for $6000. Finally found one for about $4K. Sold it immediately.

    “A Good Car with a Flawed Business Model” is Cadillac’s business model. It is amazing they are still in business.

    Cadillac missed the mark on the styling, the grill was too small, the edges were too boxy, the Evoq had the attention of a lot of well healed buyers, when the XLR was unveiled it was a total let down to the customer base that patiently waited. The Alliante had one of the best designed gauge clusters that only recently has become dated looking, for short money GM could have innovated with a full LED dash (Lexus did it with the LFA). The result would have yielded a car with a cult following and collectability of the Lotus Elise.
    A car that keeps the Lotus brand desirable even to this day.

    Celestiq is a failure. It is not a good looking shape. At least in back. XLR was a good looking vehicle, but GM’s problem is GM. They want to sell a ton. A car like that will never sell a ton. It is more of a model to have against Mercedes SLs and BMW high end coupes. Its purpose is not to make money. and that won’t work in GM world. Unless they can sell as many as at least Vettes, they will cut it.

    Maybe the hardtop convertible thing was just a fad that didn’t sell well enough in any model? (Mercedes numbers still seem low, but maybe they had enough profit baked in?)

    How’s this car do with a soft top I wonder…

    A friend of mine bought one for his classic car collection. Not long after the drivers side power window switch went south. The replacement cost $900 as it was part of the door panel. End of Aliante with a For Sale sign. If you remember, GM would fly bodies in from Italy using a 747 and made it part of their advertising. Wonder which dim bulb thought that one up.

    A friend had the XLR-V model for a few years. Sitting in the XLR seemed like sitting on the ground in a bathtub, to me. I don’t mind a low seating position, but sure don’t like overly tall sides. And, while good-looking, the XLR was never as pleasing to the eyes as the Allante.

    I liked them. They were interesting cars and had good dynamics. But I do recall lots of people being not too into the styling versus the Corvette at the time so they went Corvette instead.

    Looked at an XLR that was a trade-in at a local Cadillac dealer. Decided to test drive it. It had not aged well. Interior was OK, except the rear-view mirror detached itself during my drive. Also noticed that the daytime amber running lights had melted the plastic headlight lenses and formed little bubble blobs. The salesman apologized for the vehicle not being sales ready.

    i just acquired a 2006 XLR-V with 12k miles and I love it. it is now a stable mate to my 2005 Crossfire Roadster, my 2005 Cashmere Edition Thunderbird, a 2024 Mustang GT Performance Convertible and my beloved 35th Anniversary Thunderbird SC. Each one fills a need in me. I like the Caddy the most. Dear readers – just enjoy the rides. Once the internal combustion engine is killed we will never be able to live and drive this way again!

    My daily driver is an ’06 STS-V, with a 469hp supercharged Northstar. The XLR’s problem was indeed GM. I see several at shows (I show my ’63 Bonneville convert), and get pretty much the same thing from XLR owners: they love them, they’re not ‘Vette drivers, and like American. They are prone to some odd issues with the top mechanism (or so I’ve been told), but hey, so are mid-60’s Continentals (LOL).

    As for the idea that the Escalade saved Cadillac…we’ll have to agree to disagree. I drove a first gen Escalade, thinking to trade in my ’95 Eldorado (which I still have, BTW). I was singularly unimpressed, and less so with the current prices Cadillac charges for them (egad). If anything, the CTS line saved Cadillac, by simultaneously making a Cadillac more affordable and making a performance model (CTS-V) for the power driver.

    The XLR, however, is a fine car (though I’m not getting out of my STS-V anytime soon).

    The Escalade’s sales were likely orders of magnitude higher than the CTS, once they got enough capacity from GM at the Arlington plant. The CTS was a car that turned the page for Cadillac, but the Escalade kept them afloat as the world transitioned from sedans to SUVs. That hyperlink in the article goes into a story I wrote about the Escalade’s successes, with interviews of Cadillac employees.

    I’ve always wanted to like the XLR but its styling was too radical in its day and hasn’t aged particularly well. The R230 Benz from this era was much more handsome and still looks good today. Had the XLR been better looking they would have sold far more of them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *